What is the difference between a textual sermon and an expository sermon

It explains what the Bible means by what it says. Exegesis is technical and grammatical exposition, a careful drawing out of the exact meaning of a passage in its original context. Furthermore, what are the types of sermons? Five Types Of Sermon Textual. This is an analysis of a specific Scripture text for use in a word for word study.

A comprehensive analysis of larger blocks of Scripture so that the bigger picture can be understood. Types of Sermons There are three main types of sermons for the purpose of our study: I. Expository Sermons A. Expository sermons are biblical sermons.

This type of writing can include essays, newspaper and magazine articles, instruction manuals, textbooks, encyclopedia articles and other forms of writing , so long as they seek to explain.

In fact, this lesson itself is an example of expository writing. Asked by: Sterica Klingeisen asked in category: General Last Updated: 7th May, What is the difference between a textual sermon and an expository sermon?

It is similar to the expository method, except that instead of selecting a paragraph containing many verses, the preacher has only one verse, or even part of a verse from which to speak, and must confine himself to impressing this upon his hearers.

What does textual sermon mean? September 4, at AM. This method of preaching, as it its name implies consists of selecting verses, a verse, or even the part of a verse as a text.

After the theme of the verse has been discovered as a text. What is a short sermon called? It is similar to the expositional method, except entire books are generally not covered. In other words, a preacher may do a month-long series covering a section of one particular book of the Bible. This section will have a main theme or thought flowing through it. For example, a preacher may preach through the first two chapters of Luke in the weeks leading up to Christmas.

Here are some reasons that make this method popular:. This is probably the most common method in evangelical churches today. Instead of sticking to a certain book or section in a book of the Bible, it remains true to a topic or subject within the Bible.

In other words, the preaching is done with several texts throughout the Bible. This method requires the people to jump around quite a bit throughout the preaching in order to keep up.

It has been said that when preaching topically, it is helpful to have the passages in a handout or on a large presentation screen. Here are some reasons why this method is favorable:. These three methods can all be used effectively in the pulpit and general preaching platforms. Hopefully this clears up some of the confusion and also helps some of us understand when certain methods are better to use at different times. Scriptures: 2 Timothy Jacob Abshire on March 5, Expository Preaching This method is generally used by those who hold the Bible in high regard.

Here are some practical reasons that make it popular: Because all of Scripture is God-breathed and for our benefit, there is not a page of Scripture that is not helpful to our faith, so we should examine it all. From church history we know that influential preachers such as Justin Martyr preached expository sermons that went through books of the Bible line by line. Reformed churches stress l ectio continua preaching through whole books of the Bible in course.

Timothy Keller summarizes the sentiment as he writes why conservative churches feel non-expository preaching is theologically inferior; "1 First, other forms of preaching are considered 'man-pleasing' because we are choosing texts we prefer rather than preaching through the 'whole counsel of God' as God provides it in the Bible.

The expositor focuses on the Biblical passage itself in a way that the others do not. Haddon Robinson argues that expository preaching is essential in a postmodern context :. Twenty years ago it would have been almost impossible to bring a case to court against a minister. Today a lawyer that's defending a minister will do every thing that he can to keep the people in the jury from thinking of him as a minister. So we have lost a lot of the base, for a lot of different reasons.

What we are really trying to say is, "O. Therefore in a postmodern age one reason that we work with the biblical text is to have the authority of the text — and behind that the authority of God — behind what we say. I've always believed that, but it has become clearer to me now than it has been in the past.