Why did bales kill

Some of the corpses were set on fire. Bales' attorneys had been expected to bring up a range of explanations for his actions. The year-old Ohio native was on his fourth tour overseas, and his lawyers have said the soldier was suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and a traumatic brain injury.

But his lawyers opted not to offer testimony from doctors, saying that it would just lead to a back-and-forth between experts. Instead, there was testimony from Bales himself as well as his older brother, who spoke of Bales' childhood, which included having served as a high school class president, and Bales' decision to enter the military after the Sept. Other soldiers testified in favor of Bales' character. In his testimony, Bales called the killings an "act of cowardice, behind a mask of fear, bulls and bravado.

Afghans have expressed outrage that Bales is not being put to death, and some called for him to be tried in Afghanistan. The brother of Mohammad Daud, who was slain in the massacre, told CBS News that not putting Bales to death shows that "America is encouraging its soldiers to kill Afghan people, destroy and torch their houses, then come to America and receive a Medal of Honor.

First of all, in Batman Begins , Christian Bale's Bruce Wayne basically refuses to execute a criminal, and instead decides to kill a bunch of other people instead. There is also the rather bogus "I won't kill you, but I don't have to save you" line from the end of that same film, which gets a fantastic Michael Keaton Bruce Wayne reaction shot in the video:.

So was he really not that big on killing? The jury is out. At the very least fans can take solace in the fact that most versions of the Caped Crusader stick to the hero's famous "no guns" rule This is an interesting time to reflect on the Batmen of before, if not just because we are so close to seeing Ben Affleck 's version of the great comic book hero in action.

Will he be a killer, or will he not take that route? And why was our Government so unwilling to review all the facts, investigate the details, and pressure SSG Bales to confess to an inaccurate accounting of the events? While we may never know the actual reason, it is possible that one reason may very well be the fact that the US Government was trying to establish a partnership with the Government of Afghanistan for a way ahead, which included a Status of Forces Agreement which focuses primarily on how we address crimes committed by US forces in Afghanistan.

And while dealing with the pressure to conclude these agreements in , several incidents happened which were creating challenges for the negotiations, to include, 1. Guards at a detention center in Bahgram Afghanistan burning Qurans the enemy prisoners were using to pass notes, 3.

With all this going on and more as a backdrop, it was highly unlikely SSG Bales was going to receive a fair trial. The deck was stacked against him. At the end of the day, it is not for us associated with UAP to determine guilt or innocence of any of our Warrior.

We simply fight to ensure our Warrior are afforded their Rights and the truth prevails. In spite of delays in the process initially announced by the Afghan government last year, Taliban prisoners have been released in droves as par ….